顯示具有 感情 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 感情 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2014年10月17日 星期五

婚姻是一場交易 Why more women choose not to marry

中央社新聞:女性不婚6大理由

美國女性不婚比例攀至新高,社會學者 Schwartz 分析女性選擇不婚有6大因素,嫁給沒用的老公只會讓生活更糟是主要原因。

近期1項民調顯示,18歲以上的美國女性有53%維持單身,再創歷史新高,女性對婚姻的渴望雖高於男性,但女性選擇遲婚或不婚有其社會因素。

華盛頓大學社會學教授 Pepper Schwartz 在 CNN 網站撰文指出,如果婚姻是樁好「交易」,自然會「成交」,婚姻不再是件好事,從女性觀點來看有6大因素。

第1,嫁給沒用的丈夫,生活只會更糟。貧窮女如遇上無錢男,只能相濡以沫,許多女性不嫁給令經濟情況更糟的男人不是秘密;單親媽媽即使依靠政府援助過活,也比嫁給無業不找工作的男人情況好得多。

第2,女性事業成就改變一切。成功女性無須成功男性在身邊加持,力爭上游的女性每天迎向挑戰,找丈夫最好先等等。

第3,女性不再禁錮於傳統角色。不想成為留在家中洗衣燒飯的女人,碰不上喜歡非傳統女性的男性,當然不會有婚姻。

第4,婚姻帶來稅務懲罰。薪資達中上程度的女性,如嫁給收入相當或較高的男性,稅率可能因丈夫把所得標準提高而更高,結婚反而造成女性生活成本增加。

第5,男人總是拈花惹草,何必自尋苦惱。

第6,女性挑挑撿撿,尋覓最佳伴侶,沒有速配,單身好過妥協出嫁委屈自己。男性也差不多,影星喬治克隆尼和許多女性往來,53歲才走入婚姻,就是等待心靈相配的現任妻子。

Schwartz 指出,社會學中的交易理論(Exchange Theory)聽來有點冷血,卻是不爭事實;人類行為奠基於付出與回報之間取得平衡,婚姻也不例外,財富、相貌與背景得相稱才是好「交易」,不過成功女人與在家寫作,順便看孩子的丈夫,或許是個不錯的組合。


Why more women choose not to marry

By Pepper Schwartz

Editor's note: Pepper Schwartz is professor of sociology at the University of Washington and the author of many books, the latest of which is "The Normal Bar." She is the love and relationship ambassador for AARP and writes the Naked Truth column for AARP.org. She is also a senior fellow at the Council on Contemporary Families, a nonprofit organization that gathers research on American families. The opinions in this commentary are solely those of the author.
(CNN) -- Some revolutions happen in a single day; others over decades. The rise of the voluntarily single woman has been happening in Western societies slowly, over time, concomitant with well-paying jobs, legal protection from economic or physical abuse, reliable birth control and the possibility of fulfilling careers and adventures.
Women are marrying at a later age these days, cohabiting with their partners or going in and out of short-term relationships without ever walking down the aisle.
Currently, 53% of women over 18 are in the singles column. Put another way, women now have choices that allow them to customize the arc of their lives and some of them find that it is best for them to put marriage aside.

Is this natural? Is this bad? Is this cause for alarm?
We have long counted on women's sacrifices and the compromises they've made to lift societies all over the world. We are worried that if women delay or forgo marriage, the all-important family unit will suffer.
As much as I admire happy couples and families, I think this may be one of the few times in history when so many women could choose from such a full range of life choices without penalty or stigma. Since few people "have it all," why not choose being single if that's the best option?

What it comes down to is people get married when it's a good deal. The question is why isn't marriage a good deal anymore? Here are some considerations.
1. A useless husband
If a woman is poor and only meets equally poor or poorer men, she's in a tough spot. It is no secret that many women do not choose to marry if the available partners will make their economic situation worse.
In some of these cases, even if a woman has a child, she may be better off with government help than a nonworking, noninvolved husband.
2. Success changes everything
When a woman is very privileged or highly successful, marriage could come very easily -- or not. Think of the likes of Elizabeth Taylor, who was married eight times. Or Oprah Winfrey, who for personal or professional reasons, is not married.
Moreover, a woman doesn't need a husband who is a high-powered corporate attorney if she is a high-powered corporate attorney. Taking advantage of economic and professional opportunities could be undermined by committing to a partner with an equally ambitious, or different, life agenda. This kind of woman may wake up every day to new and exciting challenges and think, "best to wait."
3. Unwilling to make traditional compromises
A woman who doesn't want to settle for cooking and cleaning and being the primary parent that society prefers. She is not meeting guys who want the kind of woman she is.
4. The marriage penalty tax
Some women are in an income bracket where marriage inflicts economic costs. She would have to pay more taxes if she marries someone who earns approximately what she makes or more.
5. Avoiding cheating men
A few years ago when I was in China, I had a conversation with some very beautiful female Chinese TV personalities about their personal life. I asked them why they were single and if they wanted to get married.
The three women all said they didn't want to marry because "the men of our class will all expect to have mistresses, and it is better not to marry than have to put up with that." I have no idea if this was an exaggeration or not -- but they believed it.
6. Waiting for the "one"
These women wait for the perfect guy, or the guy who they would fall in love with and love them back just as much. If that man doesn't come along, they prefer to go alone. As women get pickier, more factors enter into the marriage equation.
They may find someone who doesn't quite go the distance even after years of dating. They cohabit with someone and it doesn't work out. Singlehood, never intentional, becomes a fact. But they will not marry just to marry as their mothers or grandmothers might have.

In social psychology, there is a classic theory called "exchange theory." It is a bit cold-blooded, but it predicts that a person's actions will be based on trying to find a balance of give and get. Each person's resources -- of all kinds, including money, looks, background -- are traded back and forth for a "good deal." For example, a "good deal" scenario could be a woman who makes an excellent living pairing up with a man who is a writer and is willing to work at home and be the primary child care person.
When women's life choices were highly constrained, they had little negotiating power. They had to marry or were seen as damaged. A few got away with being "free spirits" but usually they were exceptional in wealth or lineage -- and even so, it wasn't easy.
It's different now. While most women still want marriage, they don't want it at just any price. They don't want it if it scuttles their dreams. Marriage is not dead -- not by a long shot. It is still, to most of us, the house we wish to build for our love, our lover and our children.
But women want to craft a life instead of having it pressed upon them. And that means some of us will be single for a long time, and some of us will be single for life.  (http://edition.cnn.com/2014/10/15/opinion/schwartz-single-women/index.html)

2013年11月19日 星期二

Blue Valentine

愛真的無限嗎?
是啊,總認為真愛應該是無限的,
但會不會是因為它無限,所以稀有?
無限的愛,不容易;愛得無限,更不容易。

愛得沒有條件、愛得永恆、愛得無限



有一句歌詞這麼寫著「儘管感情裡多善良也不保證有天堂」
愛情不是只靠真心就能長久,真心對自己好的人,不見得懂自己。
所以,在一起的2個人,無法懂得彼此,那麼即使是真心,也很難長久。

當Cindy指著自己的心對著Dean說:「我這裡已經沒有你了...」  Dean痛徹心扉。
對,這就是「我不愛你了」,愛情消失了...

Blue Valentine (2010) 

男女主角,2個人都沒錯,最初2個人是真心相愛無誤,只是...

Cindy在不懂事的年輕時期,不小心懷孕,但她不知道該怎麼做才好,剛好Dean的出現,帶給她愛情的浪漫,更承諾她家庭的責任。只是年經的Cindy不夠成熟,沒想過「如果Dean的成就一直停留於現況,自己能接受嗎?」因為Cindy當時只知道自己有成為醫生的夢想、只知道Dean聰明有才華、只知道現在Dean給的正是自己最需要的。當時的Cindy真的愛Dean,但她不知道當Dean決定與自己結婚時,便下定決心做個好丈夫、好爸爸,過著平凡市井小民的家庭生活已成為Dean今生的唯一夢想。我想這可能也是因為Dean從小父母離異,所以美滿的家庭生活才會成為他最大的夢想。

Dean是真心愛Cindy母女,即使Dean也有人性的一面,希望真的能與Cindy有愛的結晶,但他愛著Cindy,對她溫柔、愛護、尊重,Dean也希望Cindy同樣尊重自己、永遠愛自己,只是Dean不懂Cindy要的是什麼。

如影片簡介最後所寫的,究竟美麗的愛情能否敵得過現實的差異?
來自不同家庭的2人,不論家庭背景是否相似,2個人就是不同的個體,想法觀念一定會有差異;
這個差異如果很大,雙方沒有很好的溝通,就會像片中的2個人一樣,六年之後,兩人對生活期待的歧異與對彼此的不耐,漸漸磨掉了愛情的火花…
Dean真的想挽回Cindy,他希望Cindy告訴自己該怎麼做、成為什麼樣的人,並且說 I will do it. 
即使Cindy是有想法的,但對Cindy來說已經來不及了,她對Dean已經沒有愛了,所以Cindy只回答我也不知道...

想瞭解更多的劇情細節,請看電影「藍色情人節(Blue Valentine)」或以下部落格 Lizzy影評。



關於愛情的殘酷事實 - 藍色情人節(Blue Valentine)

「藍色情人節」的真實,令人感到害怕,很多人看電影是為了求一個"escape",如果你也是,那「藍色情人節」就不適合你了。但你如果可以在看電影時承受一些現實的殘酷,請別錯過「藍色情人節」這部相當細緻的傑作,一定能在看完之後感慨無限。

本片的主角是背景與個性很不同的Dean與Cindy,陷入了不可自拔的愛情後結婚,然而六年之後,兩人對生活期待的歧異與對彼此的不耐,漸漸磨掉了愛情的火花…

看完 Blue Valentine,你可能只會覺得痛苦,它與真實人生一樣充滿幻滅與失望。最本片棒的一點是,並非帶著酸/嫉妒/憎恨浪漫的態度,而是用觀察者的冷靜態度,陳述這哀傷的事實,帶來的衝擊力更大。Blue Valentine最可怕的就是這種真實感,我們多多少少都認識幾個辛苦待在痛苦婚姻裡的人,也許是為孩子,也許是怕孤單,也許是沒有其他更好的選擇,大家都沒有錯,但愛情就是消失了。

當初真正讓Cindy嫁給Dean的原因,可以說是Dean的一股傻氣。這股安逸自在的傻氣,可以讓Cindy開懷笑,可以讓陷入人生困境的Cindy得到一個避風港,可以讓她繼續享受快樂。但婚後,讓Cindy不想理他的原因也是這股傻氣,Dean喜歡他的安逸生活,有老婆有小孩一切美滿,懶得對事業太有抱負,他想討老婆歡心的方法,就是傻氣地訂個有著低俗味的汽車旅館與老婆喝酒做愛。就這樣,當初十分吸引Cindy的那個人,變成了讓Cindy覺得噁心、丟臉、連碰都不想碰的人。但Dean若不是有那樣的個性,一開始怎會在Cindy的各種麻煩狀況下娶她呢?Cindy跟前男友未婚懷孕卻不忍墮胎,Dean一肩扛了下來,向她求婚,並將小孩視如己出,若不是靠一點天真的傻氣,怎麼能做到呢。但是在愛情裡面討論這些是沒有用的,因為愛就是消逝了啊。沒有人是錯的,Dean只要有他的老婆與孩子就心滿意足,他對婚姻忠心耿耿,這沒有甚麼不對;Cindy是個積極向上的人,她希望老公也積極些減輕家裡負擔、教導小孩的態度要成熟點,這也沒什麼不對。但有時歧見與瑣事讓愛消逝,也就是本片愛情故事中段被省略的那段。或許有些人會認為本片只描述愛情的開端與結束,令人摸不著腦袋,不知道兩人出了什麼問題,我倒是覺得以他們的背景、個性與結婚的理由,很容易想像他們會走上離異的路,細節已經沒那麼重要了,而這種對照式的描述方法更令人感受到世事的殘酷,正如同電影裡出現的那首歌:You Always Hurt the Ones You Love。有時候,愛是不夠的。

令我感覺最痛的,是最後一幕,兩人明白真的到終點了,不可能有轉圜餘地,心碎的Dean要離開,但女兒哭著衝上前去追著爸爸,但Dean忍痛裝作若無其事要女兒乖乖去找媽媽,不要來追他,這是多麼難的放手!多麼偉大的愛!Dean如果自私點,也可乾脆趁機把女兒帶走,或是利用這點大打親情牌,不僅可以得到女兒的陪伴,還可拿來當談判籌碼,但Dean真心愛Cindy與女兒,他不願利用女兒來傷害這對母女,他寧願裝作沒事,堅強地往前走。Dean是個善良的好人,就如同當年他在幫一位老人搬進安養院時,忍不住幫老人布置得很溫暖,而不是把東西擺了就走,只可惜在現實生活中,兩個好人在一起,也不代表一定有好下場。(影評全文 痞客邦 PIXNET - Lizzy影評 http://wildflower.pixnet.net/blog/post/28564196)

2013年11月18日 星期一

經濟學家談情說「愛」

【朱敬一】
最近數週,葉金川愛不愛台灣或陳菊愛不愛台灣,以及他們兩人誰「更愛」台灣,
成為輿論討論的焦點。一般人以為經濟學家擅長理性分析,不了解感性世界,其
實是百分之百的誤解。「愛」是正港經濟學分析的範圍;不信,我解釋給你聽。

華人社會 偏愛男孩

華人家庭長久以來有重男輕女的傾向,許多父母親都偏愛男孩。他們口頭上不便
承認,但在作為上卻是無所遁形。父母做產前超音波檢查,發現是女嬰因而墮胎
的比例,遠大於男孩的比例。在超音波技術發明之前,全世界各國新生嬰兒的男
/女比約為一.○四,但在超音波普及之後,這個比例在中國大陸、韓國、台灣
等社會暴增至一.一○,這不是東方社會偏「愛」男孩,是什麼?

不想要女孩的父母可能不生,即使生下來了,許多父母親還是重男輕女。論子女
教育,一定是儘量讓男孩唸書,女孩排後面。論父母遺產,也一定是男多女少;
台灣甚至有百分之七十以上的家庭女孩子分不到一文錢。以教育資源與遺產分配
型態來看,這是不折不扣的偏「愛」男生,再無辯駁空間。

主觀心態 難分軒輊

但是經濟學家談情說「愛」,有三個大原則。其一,「愛」是主觀的、隱藏於內
的、外人難以捉摸的心態。我們只能從人的遺產分割、教育資源分配、墮胎抉擇,
去推論父母親對男孩女孩的偏愛差別,而不能劈頭就主觀質問父母親:「你有沒
有偏愛男生?」真這樣問,大家都會否認;問不出名堂,徒具作秀效果。

愛的第二個經濟原則是難分主觀強弱:某甲某乙都愛一位女生,科學上不容易分
辨「誰愛的比較深」。甲在女生宿舍門口站崗較久,也許只是因為甲的體力好。
乙在情人節送的玫瑰花朵數較多,也許是因為乙較有錢。同理,某位政治人物在
特殊環境下的特殊表現,多少與其講話的分寸掌握有關。愛既是主觀偏好,我們
就很難對任意兩人之間的偏好差異強分孰大孰小。

經濟學對愛的分析是依循自由主義、人本主義的哲學基礎。準此,「愛」是人的
主觀偏好、是每個人的秘密。人與人之間除非足夠親近,基於對人的尊重,根本
不會隨便問對方「愛不愛台灣」;這是經濟學談愛的第三個原則。一旦被人逼問,
標準答案應該是:「愛與不愛干卿底事?」

以愛相詢 愚蠢至極

也許有人以為,公眾政治人物愛不愛台灣,當然可以拿出來檢視。但問題是要如
何檢視。某丙將國家機密賣給敵方,這似乎是「不愛國」的明證,但此處也有論
述的盲點。出賣國家利益的人,我們只知道他「愛錢甚於愛國」,倒還不能依此
而論斷此人不愛國。換言之,若某人對錢愛到難以自拔,那他就極有可能賣掉國
家。

總之,「甲乙相比誰更愛台灣」的問題,理性的人都不屑問,有尊嚴的人都不屑
答。

(作者為中研院院士、中華經濟研究院董事長)
【2009-06-01/聯合報/A4 版/要聞】